十年未检出癌症确诊即晚期，女律师状告爱康国宾索赔处理意见公布

Core Viewpoint - The investigation into Aikang Guobin's medical examination centers revealed issues such as unregistered multiple practice locations for physicians, incomplete health examination reports, and improper medical waste collection records, leading to a supervisory notice for rectification [1][3]. Group 1: Investigation Findings - The Beijing Municipal Health Commission's response indicated that no major violations such as misdiagnosis or data falsification were found in the core examination services of Aikang Guobin's facilities, although some institutions had issues with medical waste management and incomplete physician registrations [1][2]. - Specific violations included the West Sanqi Clinic having unregistered multiple practice locations for physicians and improper medical waste collection records, resulting in a supervisory notice and negative practice scoring [3]. - The West Neimen Clinic received a warning and a fine of 2,000 yuan for non-compliance with health standards regarding medical waste storage [3]. Group 2: Legal and Regulatory Actions - Aikang Guobin has filed a lawsuit against Zhang Xiaoling for defamation, seeking 10 million yuan in damages due to claims of misdiagnosis and data falsification related to her cancer diagnosis [4]. - The investigation into the qualifications of the involved physicians found no evidence of fraud in their academic credentials or publications, and the Beijing Municipal Health Commission plans to conduct a technical appraisal of the medical incidents raised by the complainant [3]. Group 3: Medical Examination Insights - The cancer marker CEA, which Zhang Xiaoling questioned, is a glycoprotein used to detect gastrointestinal tumors, and its abnormal levels indicate the need for further screening [4]. - Experts suggest that while early detection of cancer through examinations is theoretically possible, it depends on various factors including the characteristics of the cancer and the methods used for testing [5].