述评：反中乱港罪无可恕，依法惩治正当正义

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the legal consequences faced by Jimmy Lai, a prominent figure accused of colluding with foreign forces to undermine Hong Kong's stability and security, highlighting the importance of upholding national security laws in Hong Kong [1][4][6]. Summary by Sections Legal Proceedings - On December 15, the Hong Kong High Court convicted Jimmy Lai of two counts of conspiracy to collude with foreign forces and one count of conspiracy to publish seditious publications, marking a significant legal outcome for his actions against national security [1][4]. - The trial process was described as transparent, with both prosecution and defense presenting evidence, and the court ensuring that Lai received appropriate medical care during his detention [6]. Actions and Influence - Lai was identified as a key orchestrator of major anti-China movements in Hong Kong, including the illegal "Occupy Central" protests and the 2019 anti-extradition bill protests, where he used his media platforms to incite violence and undermine the government [2][4]. - Evidence presented in court indicated that Lai conspired with foreign entities to solicit sanctions against Hong Kong and China, demonstrating a clear intent to destabilize the region [5][6]. External Interference - The article criticizes Western politicians and media for attempting to interfere in the judicial process, labeling their actions as a violation of legal principles and an attempt to absolve Lai of his crimes [6][7]. - It asserts that external forces have been emboldened by figures like Lai, who have acted as agents for foreign interests, thereby complicating Hong Kong's governance and security [3][4][7]. National Security Implications - The actions of Lai and his associates are framed as a direct threat to national security and the principle of "One Country, Two Systems," necessitating strict legal repercussions to restore order and stability in Hong Kong [4][7]. - The article concludes with a strong affirmation of the commitment to uphold national security laws, asserting that the judicial outcome serves as a warning to those who seek to undermine Hong Kong's stability [7].