被执行人跟法院玩“买卖不破租赁”的游戏被拆穿

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a case where individuals attempted to obstruct court enforcement through a fraudulent rental agreement, leading to severe penalties imposed by the court [1]. Group 1: Case Details - Tang borrowed 1.35 million yuan by mortgaging his property but later failed to repay, resulting in a court ruling for the bank to auction the property [1]. - A "tenant," Li, presented a rental contract claiming he had rented the property for 15 years with a total payment of 1.09 million yuan, attempting to invoke the "lease survives sale" principle [1]. - The court identified several suspicious elements in Li's claims, including the unusual payment structure and lack of standard utility payment evidence [1]. Group 2: Court's Decision - The court concluded that Tang and Li colluded to create a false rental agreement to hinder the execution of the court's ruling [1]. - Li's objection to the execution was rejected, and he was fined 15,000 yuan for his actions [1].