Merchants assail card fees pact

Core Viewpoint - Merchant groups are opposing a settlement aimed at resolving long-standing litigation regarding interchange fees set by Visa and Mastercard, claiming it grants excessive legal immunity to these networks [1][4]. Group 1: Settlement Details - The settlement proposed would reduce posted credit interchange rates by ten basis points for five years and impose a 1.25% rate for standard consumer cards over an eight-year period [4]. - Merchants would gain the right to refuse certain higher-cost Visa and Mastercard-branded credit cards, deviating from the networks' "honor all cards" policy, and would be allowed to impose surcharges on specific cards [4]. Group 2: Merchant Objections - Merchants, including major organizations like the National Restaurant Association and Walmart, argue that the settlement resembles a previously rejected agreement and does not enforce significant changes in how interchange fees are determined [2][3]. - The objections highlight concerns over the temporary nature of the fee caps and the lack of fundamental reforms in the fee-setting process, which they believe undermines antitrust laws [3][4]. Group 3: Legal and Class Action Implications - The settlement is criticized for providing Visa and Mastercard with immunity from future litigation regarding their fees, which some merchants argue perpetuates an antitrust violation [4]. - Walmart has requested the court to decertify the class action, allowing large merchants to opt out or redefine the class to exclude them, claiming that the settlement primarily benefits a smaller subgroup of merchants [5].