经纪公司晒知名女星收入:已支付1.39亿元
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao·2025-12-17 08:24

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing dispute between actress Ju Jingyi and her management company, Siba Media, has escalated, with both parties issuing statements on social media regarding contract termination and allegations of forgery and income misrepresentation [1][2][20]. Group 1: Allegations and Responses - Ju Jingyi's team accuses Siba Media of forging a supplementary agreement and violating multiple terms of their contract, leading to a formal termination request on June 15, 2024 [2][4][10]. - Siba Media claims that the supplementary agreement was signed by Ju Jingyi and has invited a professional institution for verification [3][26]. - Ju Jingyi's legal representatives assert that Siba Media has engaged in fraudulent practices, including the use of double contracts to conceal true earnings and misappropriating her income [4][8][10]. Group 2: Financial Disputes - Siba Media states that they have paid Ju Jingyi over 139 million yuan (approximately 19.5 million USD) in pre-tax income, with a monthly fixed salary of 250,000 yuan (approximately 35,000 USD) [15][16]. - The company also claims to have invested over 160 million yuan (approximately 22.4 million USD) in her solo career development, providing various benefits including housing and transportation [16][17]. - Ju Jingyi's team argues that Siba Media has failed to disclose actual earnings and has not paid her the full share of her income, violating the contract terms [8][12]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - Ju Jingyi's legal team has filed a lawsuit against Siba Media, seeking to confirm the termination of the contract and hold the company accountable for its alleged breaches [9][12]. - The court has been involved in determining the authenticity of signatures on the disputed agreements, with previous assessments unable to confirm that the signatures were indeed Ju Jingyi's [10][11]. - The ongoing legal battle reflects broader issues within the idol management industry, where similar disputes have occurred, highlighting the complexities of artist-management contracts [28][29].