Core Viewpoint - The case of Ms. Jiang's inheritance highlights the conflict between legal regulations regarding unclaimed estates and public sentiment, emphasizing the need for a balance between legal adherence and human compassion in administrative processes [1][4]. Legal Framework - According to Article 1160 of the Civil Code, unclaimed estates without heirs revert to the state for public welfare, while Article 1145 states that if there are no heirs or they renounce inheritance, the local civil affairs department or village committee acts as the estate manager [2]. - The Shanghai Municipal Government's guidelines specify that after managing debts and assets, any remaining estate can be claimed by the state through a court process, and funeral expenses must be validated through legal procedures [2]. Public Reaction - The public criticism stems from a lack of understanding of the legal framework governing unclaimed estates, as many people naturally assume they can use their own inheritance for their funeral arrangements [3]. - The communication style of officials, particularly the phrase "only a sea burial is possible," was perceived as cold and insensitive, contributing to public outrage [3]. Proposed Solutions - The resolution lies in balancing legal compliance with empathetic engagement, ensuring that the civil affairs department operates within the law while also considering the emotional needs of the deceased's friends and family [4]. - It is essential for officials to communicate policies effectively, demonstrate understanding, and expedite processes to prevent further conflict [4].
独身逝者遗产不能给自己买墓地?为民办事讲“法”之前不妨先讲“情”
Di Yi Cai Jing·2025-12-17 09:13