荣成市审计局清单赋能研审协同推动研究型审计落地见效
Qi Lu Wan Bao·2025-12-17 09:26

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the implementation of a "research-based audit checklist" mechanism to enhance audit quality through systematic management and proactive research [1] - The audit process is transformed from reactive problem-solving to proactive assessment, ensuring alignment with central tasks and macro decision-making [1] - The establishment of various checklists, including "superior deployment checklist" and "local policy checklist," aims to consolidate political attributes and policy support for audit work [1] Group 2 - The article highlights the importance of a closed-loop management mechanism that follows the "politics—policy—project—funding" line to ensure orderly implementation of checklist construction [1] - The focus is on researching policies, projects, and funding introduced since 2025, with departments responsible for summarizing, reviewing, and guiding rectifications to ensure checklist quality [1] - A shared platform is created to form a comprehensive knowledge base of checklists, facilitating knowledge sharing and collaborative research through keyword searches [1] Group 3 - The practical value of the checklist is realized through the identification of high-risk and significant areas, which serve as important bases for audit project initiation [2] - The content of the checklist allows for precise targeting of audit focuses, effectively improving the efficiency of problem detection [2] - Regular and institutionalized checklist submissions and discussions enhance the capabilities of audit personnel in policy research, data analysis, and macro thinking, supporting high-quality development of audit work [2]