第十四届全国政协委员尹艳林： “十五五”规划建议指引产业体系建设再上台阶

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the insights of Yin Yanlin, a member of the 14th National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, regarding the "15th Five-Year Plan" and its implications for the development of China's industrial system [1][2] Group 1: Achievements and Challenges - During the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, China made significant achievements in industrial development, including the formation of a complete industrial system and steady progress in new productivity, while addressing some critical issues in the industrial chain [1] - However, there remains considerable room for improvement in technological innovation capabilities and the upgrading of industrial structures within China's industrial system [1] Group 2: Strategic Directions of the 15th Five-Year Plan - The "15th Five-Year Plan" is positioned as a critical period for achieving socialist modernization, with goals such as significant improvements in high-quality development and enhanced quality of life for the people [1] - The plan emphasizes the exploration of diverse technological routes, typical application scenarios, feasible business models, and market regulatory frameworks to promote new economic growth points in areas like quantum technology, biomanufacturing, hydrogen energy, nuclear fusion, brain-computer interfaces, embodied intelligence, and 6G mobile communication [1] Group 3: Focus on Traditional Industries - Yin Yanlin asserts that the focus of economic development should remain on the real economy, with traditional industries serving as the foundation of China's industrial system [2] - The transformation and upgrading of traditional industries through new technologies can create new productivity, highlighting the importance of maintaining this sector [2] Group 4: Future Development Principles - The future development of industries should adhere to the principle of combining effective markets with proactive government involvement, ensuring that market forces primarily guide industrial development and resource allocation while the government plays a role in creating a conducive environment [2]