如何打通堵点卡点？一组漫评生动解读全国统一大市场建设

Group 1 - The core objective of the "14th Five-Year Plan" is to advance the construction of a unified national market, aiming to build a strong domestic market and accelerate the formation of a new development pattern while eliminating obstacles to market construction [1] - A series of analyses focus on six key areas: addressing low-price disorder in competition, rectifying government procurement bidding irregularities, correcting local investment attraction issues, promoting integrated development of domestic and foreign trade, filling regulatory gaps, and correcting performance evaluation biases [1] Group 2 - The prevalence of "price wars" is hindering industry development, as companies are trapped in low-price, homogeneous competition, which delays industrial transformation and innovation [4] - The solution lies in guiding market competition back to its value essence, establishing clear boundaries for healthy competition, and allowing industries to thrive based on core strengths [4] Group 3 - The bidding process has been compromised by "low-price, low-quality" competition and "personal connections," leading to unfair market conditions and potential safety hazards from substandard projects [7] - There is a need for transparent and fair regulations to restore the essence of competition based on capabilities rather than connections [7] Group 4 - Local governments have historically relied on investment attraction to drive economic growth, but the competition has devolved into a "grab business" mentality, leading to unfair practices and environmental risks [10] - A shift in investment logic is occurring, with a focus on attracting projects that meet environmental and quality standards, thereby promoting sustainable development [10] Group 5 - The integration of domestic and foreign trade has faced challenges due to supply-demand mismatches and high market transition costs, preventing the full potential of China's vast market from being realized [13] - Efforts are needed to align international standards with domestic ones, reduce friction costs for businesses transitioning from export to domestic sales, and enhance brand building and marketing innovation [14] Group 6 - The construction of a unified national market is fundamentally a battle for institutional development, requiring the establishment of a cohesive regulatory framework to enhance market vitality [17] - Current issues such as local policy disparities and inconsistent regulatory standards hinder resource allocation efficiency and contribute to low-level repetitive construction [17] Group 7 - Local governments have exhibited a tendency to prioritize short-term tax revenue over sustainable development, leading to fragmented market rules and a misalignment of performance evaluation [19] - A multi-dimensional performance evaluation system is essential to rectify these biases and promote a cohesive national market strategy [19]