Group 1 - The core objective of the 14th Five-Year Plan is to advance the construction of a unified national market, aiming to build a strong domestic market and accelerate the formation of a new development pattern while eliminating obstacles to market construction [1] - A series of analyses focus on six key areas: addressing low-price disorder in competition, rectifying government procurement bidding irregularities, correcting local investment attraction issues, promoting integrated development of domestic and foreign trade, filling regulatory gaps, and correcting performance evaluation biases [1] Group 2 - The chaotic "price war" is hindering industry development, tying companies to low-profit and homogeneous competition, which delays industrial transformation and consumes innovation resources [3] - The need to guide market competition back to its value essence is emphasized, establishing clear boundaries for "healthy competition" to foster a positive cycle based on core strengths [3] Group 3 - The bidding process has been compromised by low-quality competition and personal connections, leading to a lack of fairness and potential safety hazards in project execution [5] - The call for transparent and fair systems in the bidding process aims to restore competition based on merit rather than personal relationships [5] Group 4 - Local governments have historically relied on investment attraction for economic growth, but the competition has led to the adoption of various irregular policies that create tax advantages and encourage high-energy-consuming projects [7] - A shift in investment attraction logic is occurring, with a focus on environmentally compliant and high-quality projects, establishing a "safety inspection gate" for sustainable development [7] Group 5 - The long-standing export-oriented economic model has created a divide between domestic and foreign trade, leading to inefficiencies and unfulfilled market potential [9] - Efforts to integrate domestic and international standards are necessary to reduce barriers for companies transitioning from export to domestic sales, enhancing overall market efficiency [9] Group 6 - The construction of a unified national market is fundamentally a battle for institutional development, requiring a solid foundation of rules to unleash market vitality [11] - Despite progress, hidden barriers remain, necessitating a focus on unified regulations and standards to eliminate fragmentation and improve resource allocation efficiency [11] Group 7 - Local governments have exhibited a tendency to prioritize short-term tax retention over long-term development, leading to fragmented market rules and a misalignment of performance evaluation [13] - A multi-dimensional approach to performance evaluation is essential to rectify biases and promote a cohesive national market strategy, encouraging local governments to align with broader economic goals [13]
【理响中国】如何打通堵点卡点?一组漫评生动解读全国统一大市场建设
Zhong Guo Jing Ji Wang·2025-12-18 03:12