【评论】争辩捐赠古画真伪，须先查清现身拍卖场真相

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing dispute between the descendants of collector Pang Laichen and the Nanjing Museum regarding the authenticity and handling of the Ming Dynasty painting "Jiangnan Spring" has raised significant public concern, particularly after the painting appeared in a recent auction in Beijing despite being previously deemed a forgery by the museum [1][2]. Group 1 - The Nanjing Museum stated that five disputed paintings, including "Jiangnan Spring," were identified as forgeries after two rounds of authentication and were subsequently removed from the collection [1][2]. - The museum has not provided clear documentation regarding the allocation and handling of these paintings, which raises questions about compliance with national regulations on museum collection management [2]. - The auction house's decision to list "Jiangnan Spring" with an estimated value of 88 million yuan suggests potential fraudulent activity, as it is difficult to mislead a company that manages substantial commercial interests [3]. Group 2 - The investigation into the handling of the donated paintings is critical, as the museum is required to respect the donor's wishes and follow proper procedures for the management of cultural relics [2][3]. - The Jiangsu Provincial Department of Culture and Tourism has initiated a joint investigation into the matter, emphasizing the need for clarity and resolution to restore trust in the museum's integrity and the cultural donation system [4]. - The outcome of this dispute could have broader implications for the museum's professional ethics and public image, as well as the credibility of the cultural donation system in China [4].