甲骨文百亿项目融资突然「告吹」，美国AI泡沫恐慌来袭？

Core Viewpoint - Oracle's $10 billion data center project in Michigan has lost funding support from Blue Owl Capital, raising concerns about the AI bubble and leading to a nearly 45% drop in Oracle's stock price since its peak in early September [1][2]. Group 1: Project Financing and Market Reaction - The withdrawal of Blue Owl Capital is seen as a significant setback for Oracle, with the news amplifying market fears regarding the sustainability of AI investments [2][15]. - Oracle's stock price surged from approximately $122 on April 21 to over $320 in early September, but has since retraced all gains as investors shift focus from growth narratives to the costs of realizing those promises [8][9]. - Concerns have emerged regarding the reliability of OpenAI's commitments to Oracle, with analysts questioning whether OpenAI will fulfill its $300 billion power purchase agreement [17][18]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Analyst Concerns - Jim Chanos, a prominent short-seller, criticized Oracle's rapid asset expansion, indicating that the company's return on new capital investments is only about 8.5%, compared to Microsoft's nearly 40% [11]. - Analysts have pressed Oracle's management for clarity on AI investment costs, but the company has not provided definitive answers, leading to further skepticism [12]. - The market is reevaluating which companies can sustain prolonged delays in returns, especially as Oracle's traditional cash flow model is disrupted by heavy AI investments [22]. Group 3: Competitive Landscape and Strategic Positioning - OpenAI's partnerships with Microsoft and Amazon indicate a diversification of its computing resources, potentially diminishing Oracle's role in OpenAI's ecosystem [19]. - The competitive landscape is shifting, with Google and other well-capitalized firms accelerating their AI initiatives, raising questions about OpenAI's ability to maintain its lead [20]. - Oracle's heavy investment in AI infrastructure contrasts with its previous reliance on predictable cash flows from traditional software, making it more vulnerable to market fluctuations [22].