普法时刻 | 原告周某某诉被告邢某某民间借贷纠纷案

Core Viewpoint - The case illustrates the transformation of construction project debt into private lending through mutual agreement, emphasizing the principle of autonomy in civil law and the respect for parties' rights [3]. Group 1: Case Background - A company (A) entered into a subcontracting agreement with another company (B) for a construction project, with a total project cost of 367,223 yuan, later adjusted to 366,000 yuan, and A paid 370,000 yuan, resulting in an overpayment of 16,150 yuan [1]. - A also paid 49,470 yuan in wages for four workers employed by B, leading to a total claim of 65,890 yuan against B, which includes both the overpayment and the wages [1][2]. Group 2: Court Findings - The court confirmed that A overpaid B by 16,150 yuan and that A's payment of workers' wages was valid, as B had acknowledged the debt through a promissory note [2]. - The court ruled that B must repay A the total amount of 65,890 yuan plus interest at an annual rate of 3.1% starting from May 13, 2025 [2]. Group 3: Legal Reasoning - The court recognized the validity of the promissory note as a reflection of the parties' true intentions, despite B's claims of discrepancies in the contract and lack of notification regarding wage payments [2]. - The ruling aligns with the principle of autonomy in civil law, allowing parties to determine their rights and obligations, thus facilitating a more efficient resolution of disputes [3].