BNSF CEO: Rail merger still a “significant threat” to economy, consumers

Core Viewpoint - A rival railroad, BNSF, is firmly opposing the proposed merger between Union Pacific (UP) and Norfolk Southern (NS), citing significant threats to the U.S. economy and consumer prices due to reduced competition [2][3]. Group 1: Opposition to the Merger - BNSF's CEO, Katie Farmer, stated that the merger poses a significant threat to the U.S. economy and consumers by potentially leading to higher shipping rates and prices [2]. - The merger is criticized for not being initiated by customer demand, with benefits primarily accruing to shareholders rather than the public [3]. - BNSF emphasizes that past mergers have resulted in service failures that negatively impacted customers and the rail network [3]. Group 2: Concerns Over Pricing Power - There are concerns that the merger will concentrate pricing power with one carrier, leading to increased rates and service disruptions similar to those experienced in previous mergers [4]. - BNSF has previously dismissed speculation about pursuing its own merger, indicating a cautious approach to consolidation in the industry [4]. Group 3: Regulatory Context - The Surface Transportation Board (STB) has strengthened merger rules, requiring applicants to demonstrate that their deals will enhance competition and serve the public interest [5]. - BNSF believes that UP has not met these regulatory requirements and has a history of failing to uphold promises made during past mergers [5].