父亲经常体罚式管教，法院认定为家庭暴力

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the issue of domestic violence in the context of parental discipline, emphasizing that violent methods of education are legally recognized as domestic violence and detrimental to the mental and physical health of minors [1][2]. Summary by Sections Case Background - Li Fang (pseudonym) and Pang Zhen (pseudonym) were previously married, and after their divorce, their daughter Xiao Li (pseudonym) born in 2013 lived with Pang Zhen. Pang Zhen frequently scolded and physically punished Xiao Li. In March 2023, he hit her mouth with a slipper, causing facial bleeding, leading Li Fang to report to the police. In September 2024, he used a belt to hit her on various body parts, resulting in multiple bruises diagnosed as severe depression with psychotic symptoms [1]. Court Judgment - The court found that Pang Zhen's actions constituted domestic violence, as he inflicted physical harm and psychological distress on Xiao Li, who was diagnosed with severe depression. His parenting methods were deemed inappropriate and exceeded the limits of normal parental discipline. The court ruled that Xiao Li should live with her mother, Li Fang, due to Pang Zhen's failure to address his daughter's emotional needs and his continued neglect of her mental health after her diagnosis [2]. Legal Interpretation - The ruling establishes that violent discipline should be classified as domestic violence. Parents cannot justify violent actions under the guise of love and education, as such behavior poses significant risks to the mental and physical well-being of minors. The case reinforces that minors are not the private property of their parents, and guardians must respect their dignity and development. Frequent verbal abuse and physical punishment of minors exceed reasonable educational limits and violate the intent of family education, as prohibited by anti-domestic violence laws [2].