GPT-5翻车：2025AI 滑铁卢

Core Insights - The launch of GPT-5 by OpenAI in August 2025 was anticipated as a significant step towards AGI but resulted in a series of crises, revealing the company's innovation stagnation and strategic shortsightedness [1][2] Group 1: Product Performance - Early users found GPT-5 did not demonstrate a qualitative leap compared to its predecessor, with some describing the updates as "mostly boring" [2] - Many users of GPT-4o protested due to a degraded experience, leading OpenAI to urgently reinstate model selection for paying users [2] - The failure to meet user expectations for a "disruptive upgrade" resulted in disappointment and backlash against the product [2][4] Group 2: Strategic Misalignment - OpenAI's attempt to reposition GPT-5.2 as a "high-efficiency executor" aimed at white-collar job needs appeared to be a reactive measure rather than a natural evolution of technology [3] - The model's capabilities remained limited to "assisting chat," failing to deliver breakthroughs in critical applications like legal document drafting and financial analysis [5] - The contradiction between elevated positioning and lagging capabilities undermined the product's credibility, as enterprise clients found GPT-5.2 unable to replace basic human roles [5] Group 3: Internal and External Challenges - The failure of GPT-5 highlighted strategic confusion within OpenAI, especially in light of competition from Google’s Gemini 3 and others, prompting a "red alert" status to focus on improving ChatGPT's user experience [7] - OpenAI's management faced turmoil during a critical IPO preparation phase, with reports of daily improvement meetings and project delays, raising doubts about its commercialization capabilities [7] - The overall journey of GPT-5 was marked by a high-profile launch followed by a chaotic conclusion, illustrating a disconnect between technological ambition and market reality [7]