莫让“全网最低价” 成为公平市场的阻碍

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is that the requirement for merchants to provide "the lowest price on the entire network" by platforms may constitute abuse of market dominance or form monopolistic agreements [1] - The practice of "the lowest price on the entire network" is seen as a form of disguised monopoly, where platform companies leverage their market power to impose unreasonable demands on merchants, ultimately undermining fair market competition [1][2] - The platforms' management attributes, such as rule-setting, data control, algorithm utilization, and traffic distribution, are exploited to maintain their dominance and suppress competition, putting merchants in a vulnerable position [1] Group 2 - The harm of "the lowest price on the entire network" is multifaceted, leading to a loss of pricing autonomy for merchants and squeezed profit margins, which may result in reduced product quality or service investment [2] - Consumers may appear to benefit from lower-priced products, but the monopolistic behavior of platforms can limit their choices, disrupting fair competition and potentially harming consumer rights [2] - Regulatory actions against "the lowest price on the entire network" signify a rejection of market monopolistic behavior, aiming to purify the competitive ecosystem and ensure sustainable and orderly development of the platform economy [2]