直指日本逆流，新华社发表重磅述评！

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of defending the post-war international order and the outcomes of World War II, particularly in light of recent provocative statements by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo regarding Taiwan, which are seen as a challenge to this order and a potential threat to regional stability [3][41]. Summary by Sections Historical Context - The article recalls the significant victory in the anti-fascist war 80 years ago, which cost millions of lives and led to the establishment of a post-war international order centered around the United Nations [3][41]. - It highlights the historical events of Japan's surrender in 1945, marking the end of its aggression and the return of Taiwan to China as part of the post-war settlement [8][45][47]. Taiwan's Legal Status - Taiwan is asserted to be an inseparable part of China, with historical documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation providing legal grounds for its return to China after Japan's defeat [10][49][50]. - The article stresses that Japan's obligations regarding Taiwan were confirmed in international law and that any denial of this status is a distortion of history [50][52]. Recent Developments - Prime Minister Kishi's statements linking Taiwan's situation to Japan's collective self-defense rights are described as unprecedented provocations that undermine international law and the principles established in post-war agreements [51][52]. - The article argues that Kishi's rhetoric reflects a broader resurgence of militaristic sentiments in Japan, which have roots in the unaddressed militarism of the post-war era [53][54]. International Reactions - The article notes widespread international condemnation of Kishi's remarks, highlighting concerns about Japan's potential military escalation and its implications for regional peace [36][41][43]. - It emphasizes that Japan's historical denial and militaristic ambitions pose a significant threat to the stability of the Asia-Pacific region and challenge the post-war international order [36][39][41].