涉住房租赁企业纠纷呈上升态势，北京三中院梳理六类高发风险点

Core Viewpoint - The number of disputes related to housing rental contracts managed by rental companies in Beijing has been increasing, highlighting the need for better regulation and clarity in contracts [1][2][3] Group 1: Dispute Trends - From January 2022 to November 2025, Beijing's Third Intermediate People's Court has handled 566 cases related to housing rental contracts, with a yearly increase from 121 cases in 2022 to 188 cases in 2025 [1] - The disputes primarily focus on six areas: contract nature recognition, validity of standard clauses, contract performance, housing quality, fund supervision, and subleasing duration [1][2] Group 2: Key Issues Identified - Issues in contract nature recognition arise when agreements labeled as "entrustment management" or "asset management" resemble rental contracts, leading to misinterpretations of legal relationships [1] - Some contracts contain clauses that restrict tenant rights, such as prohibiting tenants from renting directly from property owners after the lease ends, which courts deem unenforceable [2] - Ambiguities in contract terms, such as unclear responsibilities for late handovers or property modifications, contribute to disputes [2] - Problems with housing conditions, including excessive formaldehyde, leaks, and noise, can lead to tenants legally terminating contracts if properties do not meet agreed standards [2] - Financial safety risks are significant, as some companies fail to manage deposits and excess rent according to regulations, exposing tenants to potential losses [2] - Cases involving unauthorized subleasing beyond the original lease term indicate that property owners can reclaim their properties without being bound by such agreements [2] Group 3: Regulatory Measures - The Beijing Municipal Housing and Urban-Rural Development Committee has intensified industry governance, with over 800 rental companies under regulatory oversight, covering 54.8 million rental contracts and 1.71 billion yuan in funds [3] - Efforts to address issues like opaque fees, service quality mismatches, and fraudulent listings include company interviews, platform monitoring, and the publication of risk warning lists [3] - The success rate of dispute resolution in the industry has exceeded 60% this year, aided by improved hotline processes and mediation mechanisms [3]