美追截第三艘“与委相关”油轮

Core Viewpoint - The recent actions by the U.S. to intercept oil tankers near Venezuela signify a significant escalation in pressure against President Maduro's government, with multiple vessels being targeted in a short period [2][3][4]. Group 1: U.S. Actions - The U.S. Coast Guard intercepted the "Century" oil tanker on the morning of the 20th, which was carrying oil from a sanctioned Venezuelan oil company, despite not being on the U.S. sanctions list [4]. - The "Bella 1" tanker was pursued by U.S. personnel on the 21st while it was en route to Venezuela to load oil, but it was not carrying any cargo at the time of interception [3][4]. - The U.S. has identified other tankers transporting Venezuelan oil that may be targeted for interception, indicating a broader strategy to cut off Venezuela's oil exports [5][6]. Group 2: Venezuelan Response - President Maduro condemned the U.S. actions as "piratical acts" and indicated that the Venezuelan Navy would escort certain tankers, raising the potential for armed conflict at sea [3][7]. - Maduro's administration has been vocal about resisting U.S. pressures, claiming to be prepared for a "deep revolution" in response to perceived threats [7][8]. Group 3: International Reactions - Colombian President Petro opposed the U.S. maritime blockade, suggesting a multilateral agreement to combat drug trafficking instead of targeting Venezuela [8]. - Cuban Foreign Minister Rodríguez criticized the U.S. for violating international law and suggested that the true aim of the U.S. actions is to exploit Venezuela's natural resources through military aggression [8].