厘清执法标准 整治不当行为

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need to rectify issues related to administrative law enforcement against enterprises, focusing on eliminating "four chaos" problems: arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and seizures, while also addressing improper behavior by enforcement personnel and inconsistencies in enforcement standards [1] - The Ministry of Justice has released a third batch of typical cases that showcase various practices across regions aimed at strengthening case correction while emphasizing mechanism construction, highlighting the role of administrative law enforcement supervision in resolving inconsistencies and correcting unlawful or improper enforcement actions [1][2] - There are reported cases of enforcement personnel engaging in improper conduct, such as interfering with merchant operations, soliciting bribes, and mismanaging seized assets, which undermine fair market competition and damage government credibility [2] Group 2 - The separation of penalties and confiscations is crucial for maintaining the fairness of administrative enforcement and ensuring the lawful management of financial resources, with existing laws outlining strict procedures for the seizure and management of assets [2] - The government purchasing services is an important measure for transforming government functions and improving public service supply, but some regions have improperly assigned administrative inspection tasks to third parties, violating relevant regulations [2] - The issue of extraterritorial enforcement remains a concern, with some local enforcement agencies imposing penalties on businesses from other regions, which is considered a violation of jurisdictional authority [3]