特朗普提高攻击调门，安理会举行紧急会议，马杜罗公开信反击美国施压

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around the escalating tensions between the U.S. and Venezuela, particularly focusing on President Trump's pressure on President Maduro to step down, which is linked to U.S. military actions against Venezuelan oil resources [1][3][4]. - Trump publicly stated that it would be wise for Maduro to resign, indicating a strategic shift in U.S. policy from a "war on drugs" to seizing oil tankers and pressuring the Venezuelan leadership [4][8]. - The U.S. Coast Guard has been actively intercepting oil tankers near Venezuela, with Trump suggesting that the seized oil could be sold or used to replenish U.S. strategic reserves [3][4]. Group 2 - Maduro responded to Trump's threats by emphasizing the need for both countries to focus on their internal issues, criticizing the U.S. for its military actions and calling them violations of international law [5][6]. - A large protest in Venezuela featured community organizations and unions opposing U.S. actions, highlighting the nationalistic sentiment against perceived U.S. imperialism [6][9]. - The United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting at Venezuela's request to address U.S. military threats, with reports indicating that the U.S. has conducted numerous attacks on vessels in international waters [7][8]. Group 3 - There is significant opposition within the U.S. to military action against Venezuela, with polls indicating that 70% of Americans oppose such measures, reflecting concerns over potential military casualties and political repercussions [8][9]. - Bipartisan warnings from U.S. lawmakers suggest that unauthorized military action could lead to severe consequences, emphasizing the need for congressional approval before engaging in military operations [8][9]. - The geopolitical implications of U.S. actions in Venezuela are profound, with analysts suggesting that the situation could escalate into a broader conflict reminiscent of historical military engagements [9].