全球AI治理陷入“叙事竞争”

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that AI safety has become a "narrative competition" high ground, as it relates to the acceptance, diffusion, and application of technology [2] - The global AI competition is characterized by four driving forces: talent, technology, products, and safety systems, with AI safety being crucial for establishing trust and responsibility [2] - The competition in AI technology is no longer superficial but encompasses the entire technology stack, indicating that every segment from resources to applications is a battleground for global AI competition [2] Group 2 - China is encouraged to construct an AI narrative centered on "human-centric, benevolent intelligence, and inclusive technology" [3] - The current global AI governance landscape is complex, featuring both multilateral cooperation and geopolitical competition, with AI safety governance evolving beyond mere technical aspects to become integral to national governance modernization [5] - China should actively engage in "supplementary governance" to enhance its discourse power and agenda-setting capabilities in global AI governance, particularly through initiatives like the Belt and Road, SCO, and BRICS [5]