EUV突破后，美国AI与地缘的双重围堵已拉开

Group 1 - The core argument of the articles revolves around the escalating technological competition between China and the United States, particularly in the fields of AI and semiconductor technology, with significant geopolitical implications [1][9][10] - The U.S. has allowed Nvidia to sell the H200 chip to China, which is a lower-performance version of the A100, indicating a strategic delay to keep Chinese AI companies dependent on imports while the U.S. focuses on its own AI advancements [2][3] - The U.S. is consolidating global capital for AI development, as evidenced by OpenAI's significant funding from major investors, which reflects a national strategy to maintain technological superiority over China [2][3] Group 2 - The U.S. military presence around Venezuela is aimed at countering China's influence, as Venezuela is a key oil supplier to China, highlighting the geopolitical maneuvering in resource control [5] - The U.S. is characterized as a "supercapitalist collective" rather than a traditional nation-state, with its legislative bodies acting in the interests of capital rather than the public [7] - The AI market is projected to reach $1.3 trillion by 2027, emphasizing the economic stakes involved in the competition, where losing AI leadership could threaten U.S. capital interests [7] Group 3 - The breakthrough in EUV technology represents a significant achievement for China, but it also opens up a more complex battleground involving U.S. strategies in AI and geopolitical resource control [9][10] - To counter U.S. efforts, China must focus on deepening its technological capabilities, particularly in AI algorithms, and strengthen partnerships with resource-rich countries to mitigate risks [9][10] - The integration of AI into traditional industries is essential for realizing its practical value, as seen in examples like BYD's AI quality inspection system and Alibaba's agricultural AI initiatives [9][10]