打工三月不知“老板”是谁 受伤后索赔到底该找谁

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the importance of clearly defining labor relationships and responsibilities in contractual agreements, particularly in retail environments where multiple parties may be involved in employment arrangements [1][2]. Group 1: Labor Relationship Determination - The court ruled that there was no legal labor relationship between the employee, Xiao Li, and the supermarket, as the management and payment structures indicated that the bakery manager was the actual employer [2]. - Xiao Li's work was managed by the bakery manager, and her salary was paid through personal channels rather than the supermarket's official accounts, which further supported the court's decision [2]. - The court emphasized that the determination of labor relationships relies on two attributes: personal subordination (management relationship) and economic subordination (salary payment) [2]. Group 2: Implications for Workers and Employers - The case serves as a reminder for workers in retail environments to clarify the contracting party and payment sources upon employment, and to retain key evidence such as contracts and payment records for potential disputes [3]. - For businesses, especially in malls and supermarkets, it is crucial to clearly define responsibilities in contracts to avoid mixed management and protect against potential liabilities [3].