日官员“拥核言论”遭日本多个核爆受害者团体强烈谴责

Core Viewpoint - A senior security official from the Japanese Prime Minister's office has stated that Japan should possess nuclear weapons, which has sparked strong condemnation from nuclear bomb victim groups and anti-nuclear organizations in Japan [1][2] Group 1: Reactions from Victim Groups - Seven nuclear bomb victim groups from Hiroshima held a press conference expressing anger over the official's remarks, stating that it undermines Japan's progress as a "peaceful nation" over the past 80 years and that Japan's non-nuclear stance must be reaffirmed [1] - The chairman of the Hiroshima Atomic Bomb Victims Association urged Japan to adhere to the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" (not possessing, not producing, and not allowing the entry of nuclear weapons) [1] - Another victim group issued a statement rejecting the remarks, emphasizing that they negate the Three Non-Nuclear Principles and undermine Japan's role within the Non-Proliferation Treaty framework, calling for Japan to legislate its non-nuclear stance [1] Group 2: Statements from Civil Organizations - The Hiroshima Alliance for the Abolition of Nuclear Weapons condemned the official's comments, asserting that anyone who genuinely listens to the voices of nuclear bomb victims would never make such statements [1] - The Hiroshima Conference for the Prohibition of Atomic and Hydrogen Bombs submitted a protest letter to the Japanese government, demanding the retraction of the official's comments and the dismissal of the official [1] Group 3: International Response - The Chinese Foreign Ministry expressed shock at the remarks from the Japanese official, labeling them as a blatant provocation against the post-war international order and the nuclear non-proliferation system, posing a serious threat to regional and international peace and stability [2] - The ministry emphasized that such statements are a complete departure from Japan's claimed path of "peaceful development" and should not be dismissed as mere personal opinions, urging the international community to remain vigilant and firmly oppose such views [2]