J&J(US:JNJ) Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen·2025-12-24 12:56Core Viewpoint - Johnson & Johnson has been ordered by a Maryland jury to pay approximately $1.56 billion in damages to a woman who developed cancer after using its baby powder, which was alleged to contain asbestos [1][9]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings and Financial Implications - The jury found Johnson & Johnson liable for failing to warn the plaintiff about the presence of asbestos in its baby powder [1]. - This ruling marks the highest compensation awarded to a single plaintiff in a 15-year series of lawsuits against the company regarding its baby powder products [1]. - Johnson & Johnson plans to appeal the decision immediately [1]. - The company has faced over 67,000 related lawsuits concerning its talc products [11]. Group 2: Product Composition and Safety Claims - Research indicates that talc, the main ingredient in baby powder, is often mined near asbestos deposits, raising contamination concerns [3]. - Johnson & Johnson denies that its baby powder contains asbestos, stating that extensive testing has been conducted to ensure product safety [3]. - The company has transitioned to using corn starch in its baby powder products, emphasizing that they do not contain asbestos or other harmful substances [3]. Group 3: Historical Context and Previous Settlements - Johnson & Johnson has been embroiled in legal disputes over its baby powder for over a decade, with various lawsuits alleging that its products cause cancer [6][7]. - In 2016, a court ordered the company to pay $72 million to an ovarian cancer patient, and in 2018, it was ordered to pay $4.69 billion to 22 women [8]. - The company announced in 2020 that it would stop selling talc-based baby powder in the U.S. and Canada due to declining sales linked to cancer allegations, opting for corn starch-based alternatives instead [8]. - In 2023, Johnson & Johnson agreed to a settlement plan to pay $8.9 billion over 25 years to resolve claims related to its talc products [8].