记者手记：一场特殊的项目遴选会，为科学奇思鼓劲

Core Insights - The article discusses a unique project selection meeting for major non-consensus projects in scientific research, highlighting a shift from traditional evaluation methods to a more debate-oriented format [1][2]. Group 1: Project Selection Process - The selection process for major non-consensus projects involves a debate-style format where both proponents and opponents of the projects engage in discussions, allowing for a thorough examination of the proposals [1][2]. - A total of 63 recommended projects were evaluated, with 6 projects ultimately selected for presentation at the meeting [2]. - The projects selected focus on groundbreaking areas such as new particle detection in nuclear transitions, synthetic cell creation, and the formation mechanisms of early solar system particles [3]. Group 2: Expert Involvement and Innovation - The establishment of a committee composed of leading scientists aims to enhance the evaluation process by leveraging their academic judgment and expertise [2]. - The innovative selection mechanism encourages discussions that can last over two hours, allowing for in-depth exploration of the scientific significance and technical value of the projects [3]. - The initiative signals a commitment from the Natural Science Foundation to support original ideas and encourage researchers to explore uncharted territories in science [4].