特朗普“行政令治国”冲击美式“三权分立”

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the unprecedented use of executive orders by Trump during his second term, highlighting the implications for the balance of power in the U.S. government and the resulting societal divisions and legal challenges [1][5][7]. Group 1: Executive Orders and Their Impact - Trump signed 220 executive orders within a year, significantly more than previous presidents, indicating a shift towards "governing by executive order" [1][3]. - The use of emergency powers has been a hallmark of Trump's administration, with 30 out of 150 executive orders invoking some form of emergency authority, a rate higher than any recent president [4][5]. - The emphasis on "national security" and "emergency" has allowed Trump to bypass traditional legislative processes, leading to rapid policy implementation [3][4]. Group 2: Judicial and Public Response - Over 20% of Trump's executive orders have faced legal challenges, reflecting ongoing conflicts between the executive and judicial branches [5][6]. - Public protests against Trump's policies have emerged, with slogans highlighting concerns over constitutional rights and the perceived overreach of executive power [6][7]. - The lack of congressional action has been criticized, with many citizens expressing disappointment in the Republican-controlled Congress for not countering Trump's initiatives [6][7]. Group 3: Theoretical Implications - The article notes that Trump's approach challenges the traditional understanding of the "unitary executive" theory, which posits that the president has broad authority over the executive branch [7]. - Observers warn that the expansion of presidential power under Trump could set a precedent for future administrations, potentially undermining the foundational principles of the U.S. system of checks and balances [7][8].