美最高法院初裁：美政府不能向芝加哥地区派遣国民警卫队

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the federal government cannot deploy the National Guard to the Chicago area, marking a rare setback for the Trump administration, which has previously enjoyed support from the court regarding broad presidential powers [1][2]. Group 1 - The Supreme Court rejected the Justice Department's request to overturn a federal judge's order that blocked the deployment of hundreds of National Guard members in Chicago [1]. - The ruling stated that the government failed to clearly demonstrate its authority to send troops to Illinois for law enforcement tasks at the current pre-trial stage [1]. - The court indicated that presidential command over the National Guard may only apply in "special" circumstances [1]. Group 2 - The lawsuit stems from differing descriptions of protests against Trump's strict immigration enforcement policies in Chicago and surrounding areas [1]. - Trump and his allies claim that cities governed by Democrats are experiencing lawlessness and rampant crime, characterized by large-scale violent protests [1]. - Critics, including Democratic mayors and governors, as well as federal judges, have questioned these claims [1]. Group 3 - White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson stated that the ruling would not affect Trump's commitment to advancing immigration law enforcement and protecting federal workers from violent protesters [2]. - Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker described the ruling as an important step in curbing the federal government's ongoing abuse of power and delaying its move toward authoritarianism [2]. - The National Guard is typically organized by states and is under the command of state governors, only transitioning to federal service when ordered by the president [2].