刘丹：与中国合作，加拿大少点“护栏”思维

Group 1 - Canadian Prime Minister Carney emphasizes the need to diversify trade partnerships beyond the U.S. to reduce dependency, particularly highlighting China as a key market for Canadian resources [1][3] - The Canadian government's "guardrails" policy reflects a balance between strategic anxiety and economic interests, aiming to protect national security while seeking new growth opportunities [1][2] - Canada faces significant economic pressure from U.S. tariffs on key industries, prompting a search for alternative markets, with China being a primary target for exports in sectors like oil, gas, and agriculture [1][3] Group 2 - There is a notable divide within Canada regarding its policy towards China, reflecting a struggle between economic rationality and political bias, with some advocating for stronger ties while others push for a more confrontational stance [3][4] - The Canadian government is attempting to reset relations with China through dialogue and cooperation, as evidenced by recent high-level communications and trade discussions [3] - The potential for collaboration in areas such as energy transition, green technology, and climate change exists, indicating mutual benefits that transcend security concerns [2][4] Group 3 - The Canadian approach to defining "critical areas" like artificial intelligence and key minerals is influenced by U.S. perspectives, which may hinder Canada's ability to engage in global technological innovation [2] - Domestic pressures from agricultural and resource-rich provinces are pushing for renewed economic cooperation with China, contrasting with the federal government's more cautious stance [3] - For healthy development of Sino-Canadian relations, Canada is encouraged to adopt a pragmatic attitude and move away from ideological biases, recognizing China's peaceful development as an opportunity rather than a threat [4]