特朗普“治国”，靠它

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the unprecedented use of executive orders by Trump during his second term, highlighting the implications for American democracy and the balance of power among the branches of government [1][6][24]. Group 1: Executive Orders - Trump signed 220 executive orders within a year, significantly surpassing previous presidents, indicating a shift towards "governing by executive order" [1][6]. - In his first year, Trump issued over 40 executive orders on his first day and more than 200 in total, compared to 77 by Biden and 40 by Obama in their first years [16][21]. - A significant portion of Trump's executive orders invoked "emergency powers," with 30 out of 150 orders relying on such authority, a rate higher than any recent president [19][21]. Group 2: Legislative and Judicial Response - The U.S. Congress has shown minimal intervention, leading to a perception of weakened checks and balances, while the Supreme Court's independence has been questioned due to frequent government requests for intervention in major lawsuits [1][6][24]. - Over 20% of Trump's executive orders faced legal challenges, reflecting ongoing conflicts between the executive and judicial branches [6][23]. - Trump's administration often appealed judicial decisions, betting on the Supreme Court's support for its positions [6][23]. Group 3: Public Reaction and Protests - There have been widespread protests against Trump's policies, with themes like "no king" and calls to uphold the Constitution, indicating significant public dissent against perceived overreach [8][23]. - Protesters have criticized Congress for its inaction, expressing frustration over the lack of checks on Trump's administration [23][24]. Group 4: Implications for Governance - The article highlights a "legislative vacuum" due to increasing partisan divides, which has led to a failure of Congress to effectively govern [24][26]. - Trump's approach to governance through executive orders is seen as a challenge to the traditional understanding of the "unitary executive theory," raising concerns about the future expansion of presidential power [26][29].