这篇重磅述评，把这股日本逆流说透了

Group 1 - The core argument of the articles revolves around the resurgence of militaristic ideologies in Japan, particularly through the actions and rhetoric of politicians like 高市, which threaten the post-World War II international order [4][5][7]. - The historical roots of 高市's actions are linked to the incomplete reckoning with Japan's militaristic past after the Cold War, allowing right-wing sentiments to flourish [4][5]. - 高市's statements regarding Taiwan are seen as a deliberate political maneuver to distract the Japanese public from domestic issues and align with right-wing agendas [5][8]. Group 2 - The articles highlight a clear historical narrative that connects Japan's current right-wing movements to its militaristic past, suggesting that the ideologies have never been fully eradicated [4][7]. - 高市's rhetoric is characterized as a revival of militaristic thought, echoing pre-war sentiments and attempting to reshape historical narratives to evade national responsibility [7][8]. - The international community's response to 高市's actions is framed as overwhelmingly supportive of China's stance on regional peace and justice, indicating a shift in global dynamics compared to the past [8].