背离开放的安全保护行不通

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has added all foreign-manufactured drone systems and their key components to a "untrusted supplier list" under the guise of "national security," specifically targeting Chinese company DJI, which restricts its products from being imported and sold in the U.S. This action reflects a broader trend of the U.S. misusing the concept of national security to suppress foreign companies and disrupt market operations [1][2]. Group 1: Industry Impact - The drone industry is highly globalized, relying on international collaboration for research, manufacturing, and application, which has led to rapid innovation through competition and technology exchange [1]. - The U.S. decision to label all non-American manufactured drones as "risky" undermines market mechanisms and competition rules, disregarding the industry's development principles and consumer needs [1][3]. Group 2: Evidence and Market Reaction - U.S. claims of "security risks" lack factual support, as Chinese drone products, including those from DJI, have been widely used in various sectors such as agriculture, emergency rescue, and film production, passing evaluations from multiple authoritative third-party organizations [2]. - Reports indicate that many U.S. drone operators and commercial users are stockpiling Chinese drones and components, expressing concerns to lawmakers about the lack of reliable alternatives, highlighting the disconnect between the U.S. government's actions and industry realities [2]. Group 3: Long-term Consequences - The U.S. strategy of creating trade barriers and administrative restrictions to support its domestic drone industry contradicts the principles of technological development, which thrive on standard recognition, collaborative rules, and healthy competition [3]. - Historical evidence shows that blocking and suppressing competition does not halt technological progress but instead raises costs and reduces efficiency, ultimately weakening the domestic industry's innovation capacity and international competitiveness [3]. - The U.S. approach disrupts fair competition and undermines the stability of global supply chains, eroding international trust in the U.S. market environment [3].