The Protocol: Aave community split

分组1 - Aave's community is experiencing a significant divide over control of the protocol's brand and assets, highlighting the tension between decentralized governance and centralized development teams [1] - The dispute was sparked by Aave's integration of CoW Swap, which directed swap fees to Aave Labs instead of the DAO treasury, raising questions about brand control and economic risk alignment [1] - Supporters of DAO control argue it would ensure governance rights align with those bearing economic risk, while opponents believe it could hinder development and accountability [1] 分组2 - Ethereum developers are advancing plans for the "Glamsterdam" upgrade, which includes the Amsterdam and Gloas upgrades on its execution and consensus layers respectively [2] - The core proposal of Glamsterdam is the enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation (ePBS), aimed at preventing any single actor from controlling transaction inclusion and order [2] - ePBS would enhance security by allowing block builders to assemble blocks without revealing their contents to proposers, thereby reducing manipulation opportunities related to maximal extractable value (MEV) [2]