“两高”发布行政公益诉讼典型案例

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate have jointly released a third batch of typical administrative public interest litigation cases, covering various fields such as agricultural land protection, agricultural product quality safety, prescription drug safety, public rental housing management, barrier-free environment construction, women's equal employment rights protection, and the protection of wartime cultural relics [1] - The selection of these typical cases is closely aligned with the principles of serving the overall situation and the people’s judiciary, focusing on agricultural judicial work, improving the standardization of agricultural practices, and better serving the modernization of agriculture and rural areas [1] - Some cases emphasize the protection and improvement of people's livelihoods by strengthening judicial protection in areas such as prescription drugs and agricultural products, thereby safeguarding the health and safety of the populace [1] Group 2 - The public interest often faces neglect due to the absence of direct stakeholders, leading to a "tragedy of the commons" scenario; the procuratorial authorities prioritize pre-litigation public interest protection but do not shy away from contradictions, opting to file lawsuits when necessary to address governance deadlocks [2] - In a specific case concerning the urgent situation of endangered cultural relics, the procuratorial authorities took decisive action by initiating administrative public interest litigation after the administrative agency failed to rectify issues following a procuratorial suggestion, thereby breaking the deadlock in cultural relic protection and facilitating substantial progress in the long-stalled restoration work [2]