美国有人炒作所谓“中国冲击论”，经济日报：脱离现实的冲击论调可以休矣

Core Argument - The notion of "China Shock" is fundamentally flawed as China's development has brought growth and welfare to the global economy rather than threats and crises [1][4] Economic Impact - The deepening of global trade and the rapid development of emerging economies like China have significantly contributed to the absolute wealth and overall social welfare of the United States, despite a relative decline in its share of the global economy [2] - China's provision of high-quality goods at competitive prices has lowered consumer prices and production costs in the U.S., benefiting millions of American households and enhancing their purchasing power [2] Employment Dynamics - From 1991 to 2011, the growth in U.S. exports nearly offset job losses related to imports from China, indicating that the narrative of job loss due to China is overly simplistic [3] - The decline in U.S. manufacturing employment began in the mid-20th century, driven primarily by technological advancements and natural shifts in industrial structure, rather than solely by competition from China [3] Political Context - The recurring narrative of "China Shock" serves specific political needs rather than rigorous economic analysis, often used to justify protectionist measures and deflect attention from domestic issues such as income inequality and outdated industrial policies [3] - The U.S. should focus on addressing its structural contradictions and leverage the benefits of global trade networks, including U.S.-China economic relations, rather than succumbing to a zero-sum mentality [4]