VBR vs. ISCV: Which Small-Cap Value ETF Is the Better Buy for Investors?

Core Insights - The Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and the iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF (ISCV) target U.S. small-cap value stocks but differ in index tracking, sector allocations, and holdings [1][2] Cost & Size - VBR has significantly higher assets under management (AUM) at $60 billion compared to ISCV's $575 million, providing greater liquidity for investors [3][10] - ISCV has a slightly lower expense ratio of 0.06% compared to VBR's 0.07%, making it marginally more cost-effective [3] - Both funds have similar dividend yields, with VBR at 1.97% and ISCV at 1.89% [3] Performance & Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, ISCV experienced a max drawdown of -25.34%, while VBR had a max drawdown of -24.19% [4] - A $1,000 investment would have grown to $1,531 in VBR and $1,513 in ISCV over the same period, indicating slightly better performance for VBR [4] Portfolio Composition - VBR's largest sector allocations are in industrials (19%), financial services (18%), and consumer cyclicals (13%), holding a total of 840 stocks [5] - ISCV has a broader stock exposure with nearly 1,100 stocks, focusing more on financial services (21%), consumer cyclicals (16%), and industrials (13%) [6] Investor Considerations - ISCV offers greater diversification with 256 more stocks than VBR, but it has experienced higher volatility, indicated by a higher beta of 1.22 compared to VBR's 1.12 [8] - The sector focus differs, with ISCV leaning towards financial services and VBR towards industrials, which may influence investor preferences [9][10]