一些地方的“零租金”之风，为什么不吹了

Core Viewpoint - The effectiveness of the "zero rent" policy, aimed at attracting businesses and supporting startups, is showing a divergence in outcomes across different regions, with some areas succeeding while others face challenges due to market distortions [4][5][6]. Group 1: Zero Rent Policy - The "zero rent" initiative was introduced to reduce costs for businesses, particularly for promising startups, and to revitalize struggling industrial parks [4]. - Successful implementations of "zero rent" include not only rent waivers but also tailored support services that foster a conducive industrial ecosystem [4][7]. - Conversely, areas that lack supportive services and precise targeting have seen negative outcomes, including increased costs and potential exploitation of the system [4][6]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The principle that "there is no free lunch" underscores the inherent costs associated with government subsidies, which can lead to market imbalances if not managed properly [6][9]. - The sustainability of "free" initiatives is questioned, as they may inadvertently shift focus from innovation to seeking subsidies, thus imposing greater long-term costs on the market [6][13]. Group 3: Effective Policy Implementation - Effective industrial policies are characterized by their alignment with market dynamics, targeting key sectors while leveraging market flexibility and creativity [9][10]. - A successful government role involves not just direct financial support but also creating an environment that encourages innovation and removes unnecessary regulatory barriers [10][11]. Group 4: Broader Economic Context - The resilience of the Chinese economy in the face of external pressures highlights the importance of timely and effective industrial policies [8][9]. - The need for a balanced approach in addressing diverse societal needs is emphasized, advocating for a shift from solely government-driven solutions to a more collaborative model involving market and social forces [12][13].