最高人民法院发布《商事仲裁司法审查年度报告（2024）》

Core Viewpoint - Arbitration plays a crucial role in resolving commercial disputes, promoting international economic cooperation, and enhancing the market-oriented legal environment, supported by the Supreme People's Court's commitment to modernizing governance capabilities [1] Group 1: Arbitration Judicial Review - In 2024, national courts adjudicated 18,566 commercial arbitration judicial review cases, including 5,475 cases for confirming the validity of arbitration agreements and 11,016 cases for revoking arbitration awards [1] - The revocation rate for arbitration awards was maintained at a low 2.22%, with only 245 cases being revoked or partially revoked, while the preservation rate for arbitration cases was high at 98.90%, with 26,770 cases supported by the courts [1] Group 2: Cross-Strait Judicial Cooperation - In 2024, national courts reviewed 62 cases for recognizing and enforcing arbitration awards from Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan, with 53 cases approved, indicating strong support for cross-border commercial dispute resolution [2] Group 3: Multilateralism and International Arbitration - National courts adjudicated 42 cases for recognizing and enforcing foreign arbitration awards in 2024, with no cases rejected, reflecting a commitment to multilateralism and the accurate application of the New York Convention [2] - The report emphasizes the importance of supporting international commercial arbitration, providing a solid judicial guarantee for the development of international arbitration centers [2] Group 4: Principles of Judicial Review - The report outlines principles for judicial review of arbitration, including favoring the validity of arbitration agreements and maintaining the finality of arbitration awards [3] - Courts are encouraged to interpret arbitration agreements in a manner that supports their effectiveness, while strictly applying grounds for revocation and non-enforcement of arbitration awards [3] - The principle of good faith in treaty performance is emphasized, with courts adopting a stance that favors the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards [3]