Core Viewpoint - The performance of nuclear power stocks, particularly small modular reactors (SMRs), has been significantly influenced by recent government support, but financial sustainability remains a concern for companies like Oklo and Nano Nuclear Energy [1][2]. Group 1: Industry Performance - The Global X Uranium ETF has seen a remarkable increase of 72% year-to-date, outperforming the S&P 500 [1]. - President Trump's executive orders in May have promoted American nuclear power, particularly SMRs, which has contributed to strong market performance [2]. Group 2: Company Overview - Oklo - Oklo is developing a microreactor called Aurora, which will utilize High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU) fuel to generate between 1.5 to 75 megawatts of electrical power [5]. - The company has received significant regulatory approvals, including a site use permit from the U.S. Department of Energy and a combined license application for an advanced reactor [6]. - Oklo has secured multiple contracts from the Department of Energy to develop its technology and build fuel fabrication plants [7]. Group 3: Financial Outlook - Oklo - Oklo anticipates its first reactor will be operational by 2027, with GAAP profit expected in 2030 and positive free cash flow by 2033 [8]. - The company currently has over $920 million in cash but is burning less than $40 million annually, with projected expenses exceeding $580 million over the next three years and close to $1 billion each year for the following four years [9]. - Analysts suggest that Oklo may run out of cash before achieving positive free cash flow, necessitating debt or stock sales, which could dilute shareholder value [10]. Group 4: Company Overview - Nano Nuclear Energy - Nano Nuclear Energy is diversifying its operations by not only focusing on microreactors for data centers but also exploring reactors for spacecraft and providing consulting services [11]. - The company is expected to start generating revenue in 2027 and profit by 2033, similar to Oklo, but has only about $200 million in cash, raising concerns about its financial viability [13]. Group 5: Financial Outlook - Nano Nuclear Energy - Analysts are hesitant to project future cash flows for Nano Nuclear Energy due to uncertainty about its financial stability [13]. - The company is perceived to be in a weaker financial position compared to Oklo, with a higher risk of failing to sustain operations [13].