“公开一切，为失败买单”！陈天桥打造AI原生公司Tanka

Core Viewpoint - Chen Tianqiao, founder of Shanda Group and Tianqiao Brain Science Research Institute, aims to validate his concept of the AI Native era through a deep log series documenting the core processes of his AI Native company, Tanka [1] Group 1: AI Native Company Tanka - Tanka is designed to be a communication platform that integrates AI long-term memory capabilities, utilizing self-developed MemGraph technology to remember and learn from past conversations, providing real-time situational insights and proactive follow-up features [1] - Chen Tianqiao emphasizes the importance of transparency by committing to publicly share the underlying logic, operational blueprint, and critical debates that determine the project's success or failure [2] Group 2: Human and AI Relationship - Chen argues that the essence of AI is computation, while the essence of humanity is game theory, stating that AI operates as a worker with fixed costs, whereas humans are stakeholders who reap the residual value [2] - He posits that human choice and responsibility are the last defenses against AI, suggesting that only when humans bear the cost does it create "credit" that AI cannot replicate [3] Group 3: The Rise of Super Individuals - The concept of "super individuals" is introduced, where Chen clarifies that being a "jack of all trades" is unrealistic for carbon-based life forms, even for someone like Elon Musk, who aggregates the best external minds to serve him [3] - Chen defines super individuals as those who make ambitious choices and bear the costs of failure, highlighting the leverage between human responsibility and AI execution [3] Group 4: Minimum Viable Responsibility Framework - Chen proposes a three-tiered path to establish "minimum viable responsibility": 1. The first level involves creating a "human-AI firewall," where humans act as gatekeepers, verifying AI outputs with their signatures, representing their credit [4] 2. The second level focuses on probability prediction, where humans, after serving as gatekeepers, also act as forecasters, attaching their confidence levels to AI-generated proposals [4] 3. The third level encourages embracing chaos, where humans seek to address gaps in data and tackle complex human interactions that AI struggles with [4] - Chen asserts that organizations will evolve into "responsibility containers," existing as legal and capital entities to bear the physical costs and infinite responsibilities that individuals cannot shoulder alone [4]