有理儿有面：日本躬匠表演撕碎日本制造神话

Core Viewpoint - The scandal involving Kawasaki Heavy Industries has exposed systemic issues in Japan's manufacturing sector, particularly in military and civilian industries, revealing a long history of data manipulation and quality control failures [1] Group 1: Company Issues - Kawasaki Heavy Industries has been found to have falsified performance data for 66 submarine engines supplied to the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force, with actual endurance capabilities only 70% of the designed values [1] - The company has engaged in fraudulent activities for over 30 years, manipulating key performance indicators such as fuel consumption and output power [1] - The Japanese Ministry of Defense's punishment of a two-and-a-half-month suspension of bidding is seen as ineffective, as there are no related projects during this period, highlighting the lack of accountability [1] Group 2: Industry Implications - The scandal reflects a broader crisis of trust in Japanese manufacturing, with similar incidents occurring in other companies like Kobe Steel and Mitsubishi Materials, indicating a pattern of data falsification [1] - The monopolistic position of Kawasaki Heavy Industries in submarine engine supply has created a regulatory environment where the Ministry of Defense is reluctant to impose severe penalties, leading to a cycle of fraud and minimal consequences [1] - The implications of this scandal extend to Japan's military capabilities, as all 25 active submarines are now considered to be operating with compromised systems, prompting a reassessment of collaborative military operations with the U.S. [1] Group 3: Market and Reputation - The incident has severely damaged Japan's international reputation in military exports, with potential clients now hesitant to engage due to concerns over quality and reliability [1] - The brand value of "Made in Japan" has been tarnished, leading to a significant decline in consumer trust and confidence in Japanese products [1] - The ongoing issues in the manufacturing sector raise concerns about the future of Japan's industrial integrity, emphasizing the need for a robust regulatory framework and a cultural shift towards transparency and accountability [1]