新民环球年终特刊⑪

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the acceleration of artificial intelligence (AI) technology iteration by 2025, with a collective pursuit of balanced development and security amid intense geopolitical competition [3] - The United Nations has established an independent international scientific group for AI to provide objective risk assessments and policy recommendations, with annual global dialogues on AI governance starting in 2026 [3] Group 2 - The Trump administration in the U.S. is promoting AI innovation through deregulation and infrastructure acceleration while reinforcing its leading position through export controls and international strategies, including the signing of the executive order to eliminate barriers to U.S. AI leadership [5] - The EU's AI Act is being fully implemented, transitioning from a principles framework to practical risk-based regulation, aiming to influence global digital governance standards through market and regulatory power [5] - The EU has imposed significant fines on U.S. social media platforms for violating transparency clauses, reflecting tensions in transatlantic relations due to differing approaches to AI and digital issues [5] Group 3 - China advocates for inclusive and beneficial AI development, addressing global South countries' challenges in capacity building and digital divides through initiatives like the Global Governance Initiative and the AI Global Governance Action Plan [6] - The establishment of a World AI Cooperation Organization headquartered in Shanghai aims to foster international consensus and practical collaboration in AI [6] - China's AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0 reflects its commitment to balancing development and security while mitigating various risks associated with AI [6]