协同发力促良性循环

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for a systematic approach to ecological value transformation, highlighting the importance of institutional innovation, industry cultivation, and market-driven strategies to bridge the gap between ecological resources and economic benefits [1][2] - Institutional innovation is identified as the "pioneer" for ecological value transformation, with the establishment of the GEP accounting system in Tonggu County serving as a key example of quantifying and trading ecological value, thus addressing the long-standing issue of "valuable but unmarketable" ecological assets [1] - Industry cultivation is described as the "carrying主体" for ecological value transformation, focusing on the transition from a "logging economy" to a green industry system, which involves restructuring the industrial chain and enhancing the value chain [1] Group 2 - Market-driven strategies are presented as the "vital source" for ecological value transformation, with examples such as carbon trading and green financial innovations that allow ecological assets to be used as collateral, demonstrating proactive market engagement to create trading scenarios and discover value [1] - The deep logic behind the realization of ecological product value is rooted in the positive interaction among institutions, industries, and markets, where each element provides essential support to the others, emphasizing the necessity of collaboration for achieving a sustainable cycle [2]