周敏、张云：当AI介入创意，如何守护“真实”

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding a photography competition where an AI-generated work allegedly won the top prize highlights the broader impact of AI technology on creative fields, raising questions about existing evaluation, certification, and copyright rules [1] Group 1: Current Issues in Creative Competitions - The photography competition faced scrutiny as the winning piece exhibited signs of AI generation, such as distorted architectural lines and overly perfect details, prompting the organizers to reaffirm their ban on AI submissions and initiate a review process [1] - Previous incidents, such as an AI-generated work winning third place in a different competition before being disqualified, indicate a pattern of challenges in identifying AI-generated content [1] - The lack of technical verification standards in many competitions allows for AI-generated works to bypass scrutiny, as many events focus primarily on artistic evaluation rather than technical authenticity [1] Group 2: Proposed Solutions - Establishing a rigorous work traceability and technical verification mechanism is essential, including requiring supporting materials for key submissions and integrating authoritative AI detection tools into the review process [2] - The creation of parallel competition categories, such as "Traditional Photography" (prohibiting AI) and "Digital Creative Art" (allowing AI), with clear evaluation criteria, can help maintain fairness and clarity in judging [2] Group 3: Ethical Considerations and Industry Dialogue - The fundamental challenge lies in the lack of consensus and ethical boundaries regarding AI's role in creative fields, necessitating industry dialogue to establish new ethical standards and agreements [3] - Stakeholders, including associations, event organizers, creators, and technology experts, should engage in discussions about the use of AI, authorship rights, and definitions of originality to create a contemporary industry charter [3] - Implementing an industry blacklist and credit system for violators, along with administrative oversight, can deter fraudulent activities and enhance the legal framework surrounding copyright infringement [3]