追踪｜“非粮化”整治下百亩圃被毁，高院提审后涉案镇政府同意评估损失

Core Viewpoint - The case regarding the forced removal of nearly 100 acres of bougainvillea in Yibin, Sichuan, highlights the conflict between land protection policies and the rights of agricultural operators, raising questions about the legality of local government actions in enforcing land use regulations [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The Sichuan High Court has ordered a retrial of the case after determining that there is preliminary evidence supporting the claim that the Jiangnan Town government was responsible for the forced removal of the plants [2][3]. - The focus of the recent court hearings has been on whether the Jiangnan Town government implemented the forced removal, with the government denying involvement despite previous court findings [2][3]. - The court has indicated that the Jiangnan Town government's actions may be deemed illegal based on existing legal frameworks that restrict local authorities' powers regarding land use enforcement [3][5]. Group 2: Compensation and Economic Impact - The plaintiff, Liu Manrun, claims losses exceeding 10 million yuan due to the removal of his crops, which includes both direct investments and long-term operational losses [1][6]. - A meeting record from April 2022 outlines compensation standards for economic crops affected by land use changes, indicating that the Jiangnan Town government should provide financial restitution for the losses incurred [4][5]. - The compensation issue is expected to be a significant focus in the ongoing legal proceedings, with estimates suggesting that total losses could exceed 10 million yuan [6]. Group 3: Policy and Governance - The case reflects broader issues in land management policies, particularly the need for a balanced approach to "non-agricultural" land use while ensuring fair compensation for affected agricultural operators [5][6]. - Experts emphasize that the government should follow a "classified and orderly" approach to land use changes, allowing for transitional periods to prevent significant losses for agricultural stakeholders [6]. - The situation underscores the challenges faced by local governments in enforcing national land use policies while respecting the rights and investments of farmers [5][6].