推动构建股东大会议案合规保障体系

Core Viewpoint - The governance proposals presented by Zhenxin Technology at the first extraordinary general meeting were not approved, with over 71.84% of votes against, indicating a potential divergence in governance philosophy between the controlling shareholder, Guoteng Electronics Group, and the board of directors [1] Group 1: Governance Proposals - The three core governance proposals, including the "Rules of Procedure for Shareholders' Meetings," "Rules of Procedure for Board Meetings," and "Implementation Details for Online Voting at Shareholders' Meetings," were rejected [1] - The rejection of the proposals suggests significant opposition from the controlling shareholder, highlighting potential conflicts in governance approaches [1] Group 2: Compliance and Governance Framework - Establishing a compliance assurance system for shareholder meeting proposals requires a comprehensive approach, focusing on legal compliance, procedural integrity, and information disclosure [1] - The drafting of proposals should adhere to principles of legality, clarity of responsibilities, and feasibility, ensuring alignment with laws and regulations [2] - A multi-tiered review mechanism should be established, with the board office or securities department responsible for initial compliance checks, and external professionals involved for complex proposals [2] Group 3: Shareholder Rights and Communication - Companies must ensure timely delivery of complete meeting materials to all shareholders, particularly minority shareholders, to facilitate informed decision-making [2] - During the shareholder meeting, clear explanations of proposals should be provided, and significant disagreements should lead to postponement of votes for further discussion [3] - A comprehensive archive management system for proposals should be implemented, documenting all stages from drafting to approval, serving as a reference for regulatory inquiries and internal reviews [3]