Group 1 - The article emphasizes a lack of a relatable figure in the online space who can effectively communicate with the public about AI and other topics, leading to a sense of "ecological vacancy" [2][3] - By the end of 2025, public curiosity about AI is expected to reach new heights, transitioning from a niche technology news topic to a significant part of daily life, with many users engaging with AI in various ways [2] - The current discourse around AI is fragmented, with some individuals deeply involved in the latest developments while others are overwhelmed by superficial content, leading to a lack of meaningful understanding [3][4] Group 2 - There is a widespread feeling of thirst for deeper, more substantial content, as the current landscape is dominated by short, rapid content that lacks depth and continuity [5] - The article suggests that society needs a clear and stable communicator who can help the public analyze and think critically, fostering a potential for diverse perspectives in the online world [6] - The recommendation algorithms of various platforms may prioritize popularity and desire but fail to account for the value of thoughtful engagement and genuine needs [7]
和大众对话的人
Xin Lang Cai Jing·2026-01-02 05:03