Some ETFs compete on price — but fees shouldn't always 'drive the investment decision,' analyst says

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of considering factors beyond just expense ratios when selecting exchange-traded funds (ETFs), as costs can significantly impact long-term investment gains [2][4]. Group 1: ETF Market Overview - ETFs have become a popular alternative to traditional mutual funds, holding approximately $13.2 trillion in assets, a significant increase from $1 trillion at the end of 2010 [2]. - The average expense ratio for passively managed ETFs is 0.14%, while actively managed ETFs have an average expense ratio of 0.44% [3]. Group 2: Impact of Expense Ratios - Lower expense ratios can lead to higher long-term gains; for instance, a $100,000 investment over 20 years at a 4% annual growth rate with a 1% fee would grow to about $180,000, compared to approximately $220,000 with no fees [4]. Group 3: Considerations Beyond Fees - Investors should consider the implications of mixing ETFs from different providers, as structural differences can lead to unintended risk exposures [6][7]. - It is generally advisable for investors to stick with one ETF provider to avoid mismatches in investment exposure [8]. Group 4: Liquidity Factors - Liquidity is crucial; thinly traded ETFs may have wider bid-ask spreads, making it harder to sell quickly [9][10]. - Investors should assess the bid-ask spread and average daily trading volume to gauge liquidity [10]. Group 5: Performance of Actively Managed ETFs - There are instances where actively managed ETFs may outperform passively managed ones, justifying their higher expense ratios [11]. - For example, the Avantis emerging markets equity ETF, with a 0.33% expense ratio, has outperformed Vanguard's passively managed ETF, which has a 0.07% expense ratio, over the past year [12].